Learn about the use of DNA
for your Genealogy
http://www.familytreedna.com/dna101.html
THE TEST KIT - Here is the
test kit; THE LAB PROCESS - Take a peek at the process; GLOSSARY - Get familiar
with the words;a glossary of words used in Genetic Genealogy ; BASIC TUTORIAL -
Now that you have the tools read the tutorial "The basics of Genetic
Genealogy"

August 14, 2006 So You Think
You're Scots? http://tinyurl.com/m499n
August 02, 2006 DNA Project
to Give Holocaust Survivors Answers About Families http://www.dnashoah.info.
June 11, 2006
DNA Proves Connection to Marie Antoinette http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/weekinreview/11harmon.html
DNA:
Genealogy Tool or the Beginning of a Police State? http://tinyurl.com/zxvhc.
May 08, 2006
DNA Study Debunks Indian Genealogy Myth Blue
Jacket at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Jacket
April 16, 2006 Opinion: DNA
Should Not Be Used as a Tool to Identify Family Trees
Opinion: DNA
Should Not Be Used as a Tool to Identify Family Trees
An unsigned
article in the Arab Times of Kuwait claims that use of DNA will lead to the
"disintegration of families." The article objects to the use of DNA,
mostly on religious grounds, claiming that such technology is against Islamic
Sharia (the code of law based on the Koran). The article quotes Dr. Mohammed
Al-Tabtabaei, Dean of the Faculty of Sharia and Islamic Studies at
April 11, 2006
Genetic Genealogy on MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3038411
Sorenson
Molecular Announces Rewards for Participants in DNA-Ancestry Database
Sorenson
Molecular Genealogy Foundation (SMGF), a non-profit research organization
dedicated to fostering global family history research and family connections by
building the world's largest database of correlated genetic and genealogical
information, and Relative Genetics, a leading global provider of genetic
testing solutions for private companies, individuals, family organizations and
genealogists, have joined forces to reward family history hobbyists who submit
DNA samples and ancestry records for inclusion in the Foundation's rapidly
expanding database.
The full
announcement can be read at http://eogn.typepad.com/announcements/2005/11/sorenson_molecu.html
.
The Genographic Project is a real time effort
to map how humankind populated the earth. It is a five-year research
partnership between National Geographic and IBM with support from the Waitt
Family Foundation, and public participation through Family Tree DNA. The three
main pillars of the project include:
s
Ethnic and Geographic
Origins: All Y-DNA tests allow you to identify your ethnic and geographic
origins, both recent and far distant on your direct male descending line. Among
others, you will be able to check your Native-American or African Ancestry as
well as for the Cohanim Ancestry.
If you would
like to help Ybase grow more, please help spread the word and
provide a link to www.ybase.org on your website.


Our line is the R1b. the three of us match
exactly all the way out to 37 markers. You share a common ancestor 7-9
generations ago, depending on who you count back from. The test is
supporting that connection, especially since a match at 37 markers means there
is a 90% chance you share a common ancestor within 5 generations, 95% within 7
generations.
37/37
Your perfect match means you share a common male ancestor with a person who
shares your surname (or variant). Your relatedness is extremely close with the
common ancestor predicted, 50% of the time, in 5 generations or less and with a
90% probability within 16 generations. Very few people achieve this close level
of a match. All confidence levels are well within the time frame that surnames
were adopted in
FTDNATiP™
Report Family Tree DNA Time Predictor*
|
In comparing 37 markers, the
probability that the three Raders shared a common ancestor within the last... |
|||||||||||
|
4 generations is 83.49% |
8 generations is 97.28% |
12 generations is 99.55% |
16 generations is 99.93% |
20 generations is 99.99% |
24 generations is 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison
of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. |
|
|||||||||||
If you would like to be tested and join this study
1. go to Jim
Rader’s web site at http://www.rader.org/dna/indexM.htm
and click on join the study
2. —Or Call Jim Rader at 916-366-6833
3. Or call
Family Tree DNA - Genealogy by Genetics, Ltd.
World Headquarters
1919 North Loop West,
Phone: (713) 868-1438
(1732-After 1812)
(1746-1816)
Married 21 May 1763
|
---------------------------------------------
| | |
| | |
Phillip Rader Sr. Daniel Rader Heinrich 'Henry' Rader Sr
(1782-1853) (Abt
1782-1827) (1768-1851)
Catherine E Siddon Elizabeth Davis Catherine Etter
(1796-1826) (1789-1849) (Abt 1772-Abt 1847)
Married 30 Jan 1812 Married Abt
1804 Married 14 Dec 1790
| | |
| | |
Philip Rader Jr. Samuel Emerey Rader * William W. Rader
(1824-1899) (1805-1895) (1798-1880)
Margaret Stradley Elizabeth Franks Barbara Hauff
(1827-1907) (1821-1903) (1803-1883)
Married 18 Dec 1846 Married 11 Jul 1854 Married 17 May 1821
| | |
| | |
William Nelson Rader
(1852-1918) (1862-1938) (1829-1864)
Nancy
Jane Hine Mary Ellen Pearson Mary Ann 'Pollyan' Bowers
(1855-1931) (1863-1948) (1831-1895)
Married 30 Jan 1873 Married 13 Dec 1882 Married 3 Oct 1850
| | |
| | |
Russell Leo Rader * Oscar Earl Rader * Reuben H. Rader
(1891-1969) (1907-1983) (1856-1932)
Hazel Devona Tullis Ellen Morgan Martha Frances Hughes
(1890-1985) (1909-
) (1863-1923)
Married 28 Jan 1911 Married 5 Jul 1925 Married 4 Nov 1886
| | |
| | |
(1923- ) (1887-1959)
Nona Malabe Duff
(1887-1962)
Married 15 Sep 1907
|
|
* Thomas Glenn Rader
(1910-1965)
Evelyn Lanore Stevenson
(1911-1971)
Married 14 Jul 1936
|
|
* James Lee Rader
(1942- )
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
*Also known as DYS 394 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
**On 5/19/2003, these values were adjusted down by 1 point
because of a change in Lab nomenclature. |